November 14, 2005
Asshole, Holocaust Denier, Racist...
M. Bryan from Strike-the-Root alerted me to a post made at Liberty Belles accusing me of holocaust denial, and that it had since been taken down. Ever the curious one, I simply searched for the post in google. Turns out The Eunuch wants more beat-down (or more links to Liberty Belles). Rockin'
More Nuggets of Wisdom from Jeremy Sapienza
In the comments thread of Clara's most recent post on the Alito nomination, Jeremy Sapienza wrote,
"Whatever loser, we want more Sapienza".Since we're approaching the Holiday season, I am happy to oblige!
Hehe, thanks! I was just being goofy and trolling you guys though. I didn't think you'd post literally every single comment.
Here's Jeremy flirting with Holocaust revisionism:
It was said by one of the talking heads in Washington that Walker turned his back on his country, and that now he would pay the price. For the record, I don't disagree that Walker is a criminal. He was fighting to cement in a State that was one of the most oppressive to its subjects in the world. But he's no more criminal than any other brainwashed idiot that kills the innocents of his own and other countries for the glory of his government. Yes, this includes you, US military men. Your government has killed more people around the world than the official statistics of the Establishment say were killed in the German Holocaust.
I use the term "flirting" becuase I can't quite tell if Jeremy is either (A) baiting people to call him a "Holocaust Denier" or
(B) actually implying that the "Establishment" (meaning 99.99% of historians) is lying about the number of individuals killed in the Nazi Holocaust.I will reserve my judgement until Jeremy himself responds.
You're in luck, buddy, here's my response:
After crunching numbers one day in an attempt to prove a holocaust revisionist wrong, I realized it would have been nearly impossible for the Nazis to have purposefully murdered as many people as is claimed. I do not doubt (specifically) the number of dead, only that they were killed in a deliberate act of murder by a person. I simply think that most died from hard labor and the disease that must have been absolutely rampant in those disgusting camps. And just to preempt idiot comments (though it didn't seem to have worked last time) -- Nazis baaaaaad. Kay?
However, if you want a good idea of how outside the mainstream "B" is, here's Steve Sailer's take on the matter:
I am totally against Holocaust Denial. It’s bogus. The facts have been documented ad infinitum. More of this and I’ll have to pull my link to your website.
Sailer posted this comment on the white nationalist blog, Majority Rights, in response to some of it's posters expressing doubt about the number of individuals that perished at the hands of the Nazi's. It goes without saying that no one would ever accuse Sailer of being politically correct.
How do you even have this kind of information handy? Does this guy routinely lurk on right-wing racist websites? What, does he work for SPLC? Feh. Besides, this guy could just be proud of the numbers.
On another note, here's Jeremy taking a shit on Rosa Park's grave:
Because she becomes less of a random tough old lady and becomes a smooth political operative -- she was already sucking MLK's dick at this point. And as you suggested, it files down the horns of evil whitey just a bit if it took a whole year for some asshole to show up and demand she vacate her seat.
For the entire context, click here.
I wonder, is he speaking of this action in the literal sense or the figurative sense?
Either way, it's pretty repugnant.
Um, literal -- she was MLK's mistress. What, dead people automatically deserve respect no matter what? or is it that black people deserve respect no matter what? Sorry, I don't play that game. I meant exactly what I said -- it cuts the coolness factor in her actions because she was a slick political operative and not a tough-as-nails old broad.
If this is the future of libertarianism, please allow me to jump ship.
November 13th, 2005 at 01:37am The
Eunuch
Don't worry, it seems you already have. Just look at that pathetic soft-National-Review blog you guys have.
Anyway, I stopped calling myself a libertarian a while back, so you can keep calling yourself whatever stupid name you wish.
---------
So I guess the only thing I'm wondering is: why was it redacted? I have a few guesses: 1) Someone said to the Eunuch "Jeremy's Jewish" or 2) The LB chicks saw it, thought it was asinine, and told him to nix it. Of course there's one that someone else offered: 3) a simple chickening out.
I'll let the comments thread deal with this mystery.
